👉 🔥 CLICK HERE! 🔥 👈

(C_thylacine) The Myers-Briggs Type Index is probably the most widely used personality test in the world. About 2 million people use it annually at the request of HR departments of corporations, universities and even government offices. The company that makes and sells the test makes about $20 million a year. Only problem? The test is completely useless. Theres just no evidence for it, says Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania who has previously written about the Myers-Briggs fallacy. The traits measured by the test are almost impossible to predict how happy youll be in a given situation, how well youll do at work, or how happy youll be in your marriage. The analysis shows that the test is completely ineffective in predicting peoples success in various occupations. The test claims the 93 questions can classify all the people in the world into 16 different distinct types and serve as a powerful framework for building better relationships, driving positive change, harnessing innovation and achieving excellence. Most believers think of it primarily as a means of informing you about the right choice of profession. But the test was developed in the 1940s based on the completely untested theories of Carl Jung and is now completely ignored by the psychological community. Even Jung cautioned that his personality types were only approximate tendencies he observed, not strict classifications. Several studies show that the test is completely ineffective at predicting peoples success in different positions, and about half of those who take it twice have different results each time. (Introverted Intuitively Vivid Thinking) or any of the 16 types derived from Jungs work, and you may have even succumbed to it. these labels are so useless and why no organization in the 21st century should rely on verification.(Getty Images) In 1921, Jung published Types of Psychology, in which he presented some interesting, open-ended theories about how the human brain works. Among other things, he explained that people roughly fall into two main types: perceivers and evaluators. The first group can be further divided into people who prefer sensing and others who prefer intuition, while the second group can be divided into thinkers and tickers, a total of four types of people. In addition, all four types can be divided into introverts and extroverts according to their attitude. However, these categories were approximate: Every man is an exception to the rule, Jung wrote. However, even these approximate categories are not derived from controlled experiments or data.(C_thylacine) The Myers-Briggs Type Index is probably the most widely used personality test in the world. About 2 million people use it each year on the recommendation of corporate HR departments, universities, and even government agencies. The company that makes and sells the test makes about $20 million a year from it. The only problem? The test is completely useless. Theres no evidence behind it, says Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania who has previously written about the shortcomings of Myers-Briggs. The characteristics measured in the test have almost no prediction of how happy you will be in a given situation, how well you will perform at your job, or how happy you will be in your marriage. The analysis shows that the test is completely ineffective in predicting peoples success in various professions. The test claims that, based on 93 questions, it can group all the people in the world into 16 different discrete types, while also serving as a powerful framework for building better relationships, driving positive change, attracting innovation and achieving excellence. Most believers see it primarily as a tool to inform the right career choice. But the test was developed in the 1940s based on Carl Jungs completely unproven theories and is now completely ignored by the psychological community. Even Jung cautioned that his personality types were only rough trends he observed, not strict classifications. , the results are different each time, but youve probably heard people say theyre ENFJ (Extroverted Intuitive Judgment c Learning), INTP (Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perception), or one of the 16 types taken from Jungs work, and this test , may have been carried out in a professional setting. Heres why these labels are so useless—and why no organization in the 21st century should rely on them. test. Myers-Briggs is based on the completely untested theories of Carl Jung from the 1960s. (Douglas GlassPaul PopperPopperfoto (Getty Images) In 1921, Jung published the book Psychological Types, in which he presented a number of interesting, unfounded theories about the human brain. Other among others, he explained that people are roughly divided into two main types: Perceivers and Judgers.The first group can be further divided into people who prefer perception and others who prefer intuition, while the second group can be divided into thinkers and thinkers, for a total of four types of people. Furthermore, all four types can be divided into introverts and extroverts based on their attitudes. These categories, however, were rough: Every individual is an exception to the rule, Jung wrote. However, even these primitive categories do not arise from controlled experiments or data.

Items